Community Board 2, Queens

Meeting - Minutes

April 3rd 2008
Community Board 2 Monthly Meeting and Public Hearing

Attendance

Andrew Anzalone	Marie Konecko
Alyson Baker	Sheila Lewandowski
Diane Ballek	Dominic Lippolis
Aida Bartolome	Rita Manton
Kate Brennan	Gregory Matos
Jean Carubia	Gertrude McDonald
Joseph Conley	Michael McSweeney
Stephen Cooper	Dorothy Morehead
Lisa Deller	Patrick Murray
Mary English	Patrick O’Brien
Richard Gundlach	Goksel Secilmis
Anne Hart	Regina Shanley
Marvin Jeffcoat	Carol Terrano
Mohammed Choudhury Jewel	James Van Bramer
Tom Kalamaras	Al Volpe
Ellen Kang	Robert Wilkanowski

Debra Markell Kleinert, District Manager

MaryAnn Gurrado, CB 2 Staff

Absentees

Thomas Casey	Rev. Joseph Jerome
Bessie Cassaro	David Shin
Barbara Coleman

Guests

Emilia Crotty	Angus Grieve-Smith
Nigel Rollings	Margaret Farrell
Eileen Bolano	Bernard Callegari
Glenn Yule	Matthew Quigley
Steven Moyano	Andrew Kirby
P.O. Yee, 108th Precinct	Tonia Moore
Deidre Feerick	Liz Reynolds
Isaac Ortega	Herbert Reynolds
Mary Caulfield	Mickey Garmendia
William Eichhorn	Dorothy Cavallo
Jane Ferrone	Chris Chu
Paula Delagila	Luis Dutam
John Dougherty	Ciaran Staunton
Welland Fuller	DOT Comm. McCarthy
Marthya Ayo	Bernard Callegari
Briget Owens	Rose Tibaldi
Dan Jacoby	Mary Tibaldi
Jean Foo	E. Lebovitz
Karen Fitzgerald	Brooks Hefner
William Garret	Tom Paino
Roger Hart

* * * * * * * *

Mr. Conley, Chairperson of Community Board 2, introduced himself and welcomed all to the meeting.

Agenda

Pledge of Allegiance

Public Comment

Dorothy Kominsky

Ms. Kominsky introduced herself and said that she is a resident of the Big Six Towers.

Ms. Kominsky spoke about low income housing under the Mitchell Lama program. Ms. Kominsky inquired about information that she had learned second hand. She was informed that Community Board 2 was approached by a Director of the Big Six with regard to loans between $11 million and $50 million dollars.

Mr. Conley stated that there were no discussions or meetings between Community Board 2 and any representative of the Big Six.

There was discussion with regard to the rental status of the Big Six Towers. A Committee Member stated that the development is a moderate income housing development; however, Ms. Kominsky has information that reads the development is low income housing.

Gabrielle Langholtz, Greenmarket

Ms. Langholtz announced that the Sunnyside Farmer’s Markets would be reopening on Saturday, April 5^th. Ms. Langholtz distributed flyers to the Attendees. The location of the Farmers Market is on Skillman Avenue between 42^nd Street and 43^rd Street. This Market would be open every Saturday until November.

Ms. Langholtz also announced that the Long Island City Farmer’s Market will reopen in July and the Jackson Heights Farmer’s Market located at Traver’s Park will open June 1^st.

Danielle Seidita, Just Food

Ms. Seidita spoke about a community supported agricultural program which is starting in Long Island City. According to the program, members purchase produce directly from a farm. Each week vegetables would be delivered to a location in LIC where members would pick up their produced

The distribution site has not been determined. Ms. Seidita explained that her goal was to find a site that would be equally accessible to north and south residents of Long Island City in an attempt to bring the community together. Ms. Seidita welcomed any suggestions for the appropriate site and distributed flyers for the attendees.

Naoki Fujita, Healthcare Education Project

Mr. Fujita explained that Healthcare Education Project is a joint initiative of Local 1199. Mr. Fujita spoke about 2.7 million residents in the State of New York that do not have health care coverage. Hospitals are overcrowded and medical insurance costs are too expensive for an individual or families to afford on their own. Medical expenses could be detrimental to those who experience serious medical issues without insurance.

Mr. Fujita is a resident of Woodside and also works closely with Community Boards 2, 4, 5 and 6 with regard to this issue. Mr. Fujita explained that this is a crisis for everyone. Although there are individuals who have health insurance, the costs are unfairly inflated for the type of inefficient care received.

Mr. Fujita explained that for middle income families, the greatest cause of personal bankruptcy is a medical crisis. Mr. Fujita is seeking to form a Committee of community leaders to work on this issue.

Mr. Fujita spoke about the success of Child Health Plus and Family Health Plus which began approximately one decade ago.

Alexis Stevenson, Queens Library Health Link Project

Ms. Stevenson introduced her organization that assists families that are uninsured with health care. This organization provides services for families, regardless of their immigration status.

Queen has an extremely high rate of cancer. The cancer rate in Queens is higher that the national average and much higher than the New York City average. Late stage breast cancer detection is twice as high, colon and rectal cancer and prostate cancer is three times higher. Ms. Stevenson stated that Sunnyside, Woodside, Jackson Heights and Long Island City are four of the most effected neighborhoods within Queens with regard to cancer.

This project gathers community leaders in an effort to define the needs of the neighborhoods and offer services. The Mobile Mammography Unit is scheduled to be at the Long Island City Community Library.

Further information can be found on Queens Library website; click on the Health Link. Ms. Stevenson explained that her contact information can also be found on through the Library or through Sloan Kettering Hospital.

Jim Condes

Department of Transportation Issues

Mr. Condes spoke about issues that require attention from the Department of Transportation.

Lighting Under Trestle at 39^th Avenue between 58^th Street and 59^th Street

This addition was placed on the south side of the street. The lights are on 24/7 on the north side of the street. Mr. Condes explained that that location is very dark and the lighting should be on 24/7 on the south side of the street as well.

Z Bricks at 61^st Street

The removal of these bricks was promised in the winter of 2007/08. To date, these bricks remain at this location.

Inspection of 31 Newsracks

Mr. Condes spoke about the Department of Transportation’s inspection of 31 newspaper racks on January 24^th 2008. The news racks are stationed on Roosevelt Avenue between 52^nd Street and 56^th Street. Notices of Correction were issued to owners of 20 racks stating they were are “Out of Compliance”. To date, there have been no improvements and Mr. Condes stated that damaged news racks must be repaired, replaced or removed within 10 days or receipt of the notice from the DOT.

MTA Windscreens

Mr. Condes spoke about the lack of cooperation from the MTA with regard to continued requests for an on-site meeting to discuss the enclosures at the Woodside and 61^st Street subway platforms.

There were enclosures at this location up until the 1970’s. Mr. Condes offered information about this issue to Senator Sabini and No. 7 Line General Manager, Mr. Lou Braccati. Mr. Braccati promised to contact Mr. Condes.

Vito Rak

Definition of Middle Income

Mr. Rak inquired about the definition of “middle Income and middle Income housing” in Long Island City. Mr. Conley would address that inquiry later in this meeting.

Parks Department

Mr. Rak spoke about the tree branches on 59^th Street. Mr. Rak has contacted 311 about this item. To date, the branches have not been removed.

Mr. Rak commended Mr. Jim Condes

Mr. Rak spoke about the continuous efforts made by Mr. Condes for the better of the community.

Comment by Public Officials

Public Hearing

The Matter of BSA Application 238-07 BZ, Submitted by Howard Goldman, LLC for O’Connor Capital Partners for a Variation from the Requirements of the Zoning Resolutions so as to allow a 13 Story Residential Building (UG 2) at the Location of 5-11 47^th Street for a Variation from the Requirements or the Zoning.

Mr. Conley introduced Mr. Howard Goldman. Mr. Goldman is a Land Use Attorney representing the Applicant, O’Connor Capital Partners. The Variance being requested from the BSA is for the above mentioned property. This proposed project is a mixed-use project with 201 units of graduate student housing for the City University of New York, 188 market rate residential units and 12 units of faculty housing for the CUNY Graduate School. There will also approximately 6,000 square feet of community facility space that would be utilized by the Queens Council for the Arts. There would be approximately 90 parking spaces within the project. The apartment building is 13 stories tall and the graduate student housing is six stories tall.

Mr. Goldman spoke about the introduction of the unique physical condition that gives rights to a hardship when obtaining a variance from the BSA. Each case is unique, each project stands or falls upon its own facts and the BSA does not recognize the concept of a precedent.

There are five findings that have to be made within this case.

1. There is a unique physical condition of this site. There is an $8 million dollar clean-up cost associated with the development of this proposed project. This site is heavily contaminated with toxic metals. The EPA has become very involved with this site.

2. Financial Hardship is another finding. This project, fully approved, would return equity of 7%.

3. Neighborhood and Community Character was discussed. This project is east of Queens West and south of the Annabelle Basin area that is also under discussion with regard to the proposal of the development of a mixed-use area. O’Connor Partners contends that the two buildings are not out of context with the community character.

4. The Hardship is not self created. The current owner/developer did not create the contamination; the soil has been contaminated for many years.

5. The Variance is the minimum necessary to generate a reasonable economic return. Mr. Goldman stated that the expected 7% return speaks for itself.

Mr. Goldman explained that there were representatives of the developer, Queens Council for the Arts and CUNY present at this meeting to address any questions.

Mr. Goldman introduced Mr. Jay Valgora of Studio V Architects. Mr. Valgora was prepared to offer a visual presentation of this project. Studio B is currently involved in several projects within Long Island City.

Mr. Valgora spoke about four major issues that were discussed recently with the Land Use Committee of Community Board 2. The response was positive.

Education

The goal is to create a graduate student residence. Many of the graduate students and faculty at CUNY are already residents of Queens. This facility would not be a dormitory. These people are very active within their communities and many are teachers themselves. This proposal is for a long term commitment where the students pursue their graduate degrees. This contaminated site, which is currently vacant, would be cleaned-up and create a community of scholars and homes.

Remediation

This site, which had formerly been a heavy metals plating facility is heavily contaminated. The location has been capped and must be cleaned up via Federal Standards. As compared to a site with oil contamination, this site is, actually easy to clean-up since removing oils can generate odors and heavy metals can be removed very cleanly. This is one of the key points of this Application. The estimated price of the clean-up is $6 million to $8 million dollars and O’Connor Partners has committed to privately pay for the cost of the clean-up

Density

The overall size of the graduate residence has been reduced from the initial proposals. The density has been reduced as well as some commercial uses. Initially, a health club was included within the project’s proposal but that has been eliminated. A community facility, which will house the Queens Council for the Arts has been added. This group has a long tradition in Queens. It has been incorporated into the project because it is part of the culture and nature of Long Island City.

Impact on the Community

CUNY is willing to commit to local schools with outreach programs. This is a great part of their mission. The Queens Council for the Arts is committed to incorporating local artist and many other local arts organizations. This project plans to offer a storefront gallery that will showcase the work of local artists. There are plans for an Artists’ Outreach Program which proposes to incorporate the work of local artists into the public spaces of the facility. This is partly in response to the challenges given to the Applicant from the Land Use Committee that expressed concern for the local artists.

Public gardens and spaces are to be created and CUNY is committed to be part of this project as well.

The project is going to increasing the site lines to the waterfront. It is all about connecting the City to the waterfront. The streets at this site are going to be voluntarily widened by the Applicant. The sidewalks would be set back at least five feet and filing the space with gardens and stoops for the townhouses.

There was discussion while viewing photographs of the site.

The surrounding projects are developing buildings that are significantly higher than the buildings proposed within this project.

No homes are being displaced for this project. This project is simply cleaning-up a vacant contaminated space and creating a community of scholars and homes.

There was discussion with regard to adjacent developments and parking garages. The height of the parking garages has been an issue with community members. This project proposes to restore the townhouses and stoop gardens which are historic to the City.

There was discussion about the drawings viewed at this meeting.

There was discussion about the importance of saving and preserving the character and the history of Long Island City. Restoration of the building façade will reflect this history.

There was discussion about the development of a community garden that would be open to the public. There were drawings viewed of the interior courtyard with the community facility inside that space. This will be opened to the public, it will be green, and CUNY plans to host concerts in this space, Queens Council for the Arts plans to host art exhibits and sculptures and is ready to make a commitment to working with the local community and artist.

The Applicants believe that it is very important to create a development that fits in with the neighborhood and contributes to the community and is inspired by its historic character.

Mr. Conley explained that when the initial proposal was brought before the Community Board and the Land Use Committee, the word “dormitory” was incorporated into the name of this project. The Board Members were concerned about the caliber of residents living in such a development. Mr. Conley explained that the Board envisioned the dormitories of Animal House (only for lack of a better phrase). The “change” of this presentation was important for the development of this project. The President of CUNY, Mr. Bill Kelly, explained that PHD graduate students make and eight year commitment to their program.

Mr. Conley introduced the President of CUNY, Mr. Bill Kelly. Mr. Kelly explained why CUNY is so interested in becoming part of the Long Island City community.

He said that Graduate Center is the doctoral granting wing of the City University of New York. CUNY is the largest educational institution in the City. There are 23 branches throughout the five boroughs. There are 245,000 students are enrolled and another 250,000 people attend continuing education courses.

The Doctoral Center is the smallest component of CUNY with only 4,200 students in 32 academic disciplines across the academics across the system. The Graduate Center is the hub of CUNY which draws the faculty from all other CUNY colleges. Many of CUNY’s programs are top ranked in the United States.

Mr. Kelly has been the President of CUNY Graduate Center for three years. Before that, Mr. Kelly was the Provost for seven years and taught at Queens College for twenty-one years. Mr. Kelly understands the importance of CUNY’s relationship with neighborhoods. It is essential for CUNY to become good neighbors wherever CUNY exists.

Mr. Kelly addressed Mr. Conley’s comparison of dormitories in reflection to Animal House. Mr. Kelly explained that he did not believe that any of CUNY’s graduate students could be characterized in this regard. The average age of a doctoral student at the Graduate Center is 31 years of age. The time to obtain a Doctorate Degree in the United States, across all disciplines is eight and one half years. These are dedicated scholars who are mature, stable adults.

In addition to the proposed student housing, the project discusses faculty townhouses that would lead some of the leading scholars in the world and into this neighborhood. There was discussion of competition for CUNY with regard to other graduate centers such as Columbia and NYU and other Universities. For CUNY to be able to recruit these scholars, it is essential to develop housing for them as well as offer a safe environment for their students.

The faculty and students share a common interest in arts and culture. They are ideal residents and neighbors.

CUNY has surveyed a number of sites in New York City for this project. CUNY faculty and students have admitted that they have been priced out of other neighborhoods that they lived in. This location will be both affordable and attractive to them with regard to the arts and cultural amenities that they look for and expect. CUNY views Long Island City as a neighborhood of cultural diversity and its vibrant neighborhood is an ideal match for their faculty and students.

Mr. Kelly spoke about why Long Island City would want CUNY in the neighborhood. Mr. Kelly explained that this is an apartment facility in which all of the units would meet the requirements in terms of square footage. There would be a mix of studio apartments, one, two and three bedroom apartment units as well. These are neighborhood homes not college dormitories. The faculty and students would make great neighbors and would show a great deal of interest and commitment in the very things that create such a vibrant neighborhood as Long Island City. CUNY wants to be part of the neighborhood and bring their programs into the community and would be very interested in establishing productive relationships with neighborhood schools through mentoring and tutoring programs. Mr. Kelly spoke about his first year of teaching at Queens College and mentoring and tutoring at John Bowne High School in Queens.

Mr. Kelly spoke about the variety of arts and cultural programs run by CUNY at 34^th Street and 5^th Avenue. Those students are always searching for venues to perform. CUNY would hope the facility described in this project for lectures, musical performances, etc. Being involved with the Queens Council for the Arts is another way to bring CUNY’s contribution to the arts of Long Island City.

Mr. Kelly explained that CUNY is very attracted to the prospect of not only being good neighbors and residents with regard to faculty and students but as an entire institution in the neighborhood.

Mr. Conley spoke about another component within this project is the space allocated for the Queens Council for the Arts. Mr. Conley asked if there were any local artists from Long Island City. There were artists from the area in attendance. Mr. Conley explained that the Community Board expressed concern about the connection to the Queens Council for the Arts and local artist in Long Island City. The Community Board believes that this should be a strong connection and a great partnership.

The Executive Director of the Queens Council for the Arts spoke about the organization. The Council’s mission is to support arts organizations as well as individual artists in Queens. She stated that it is difficult for the Council to operate effectively from the current location which is why the Queens Council for the Arts is extremely interested in the O’Connor Project in Long Island City, especially in partnership with CUNY.

The organization’s mission is borough wide; however a substantial amount of programming and funding takes place in Long Island City. In the last three years, the organization has granted over $600,000 and 25% of that has gone to Long Island City artists and artist organizations. Queens Council for the Arts is looking forward to working with CUNY. The rep said she currently sits on the Board of the Frank Sinatra School for the Arts.

The Queens Council for the Arts has held over 30 different events over the past three years for artist to gather.

The organization is currently planning new initiates such as a partnership with the regional director of State Parks and the Queens Theater in the Park to develop a summer performance series in Gantry State Park. It is the desire of Queens Council for the Arts to build a vibrant summer presence along the waterfront that would serve the community.

The rep assured the Attendees that the Queens Council for the Art, going forward, intends to continue to be strong support and advocacy of artists in Queens and for the local artists of Long Island City.

Mr. Conley invited Mr. Goldman to summarize the project and its changes since its introduction in November.

Mr. Goldman explained that this is a graduate center versus a dormitory and the Applicants have committed to that modification. The architecture has been refined with respect to the design townhouses and their architectural details as well as the width of the street. The Queens Council of the Arts has come into the project as a result of the Applicants work with the Land Use Committee. The courtyard that is being provided would be opened to the public and available for public activity as a result of the Applicants work with the Land Use Committee.

There has been discussion with regard to funding for this project through the Brownfields Program with respect to the clean-up of the site. Mr. Goldman also stated that the Applicants have also committed to discuss, with the Land Use Committee, the use for any excess funds as a result of that funding. Mr. Goldman mentioned, perhaps, the development of a library.

Mr. Conley opened the meeting for Public Comment regarding this Application.

Ms. Karen Fitzgerald

Ms. Fitzgerald is a visual artist and has been living and working in Long Island City for 25 years. Ms. Fitzgerald spoke in support of this project. Ms. Fitzgerald spoke about the benefits of Queens Council for the Arts as a neighbor in Long Island City. Ms. Fitzgerald is a Board Member of the Long Island City Artists, Inc. which recently celebrated 20 years. Queens Council for the Arts is a great supporter of that corporation. Queens Council for the Arts has also supported Ms. Fitzgerald personally as an artist.

Ms. Fitzgerald spoke of the currently location Queen Council for the Arts. That location can be inconvenient. By Queens Council for the Arts moving to Long Island City would be a great benefit for the artists of the community.

Mr. Brooks Hefner

Mr. Heffner is a 30 year old, married PHD student of English at the CUNY Graduate Center. Mr. Hefner spoke in support of this project. Mr. Hefner has been a student at the Graduate Center for four years and lives in Elmhurst, Queens. Mr. Hefner moved into Elmhurst after being “priced out” of Astoria. Mr. Hefner explained that that is one of the reasons that this project would be beneficial for the graduate students of the community. Graduate students view graduate school as an intellectual enterprise as well as professional school; graduate students are working to become professionals. The vast majority of the students are teachers as well. Mr. Hefner has taught at LaGuardia Community College and Queens College.

Mr. William Garrett

Mr. Garrett is a Member of 4747 Residence Group in Long Island City. Mr. Garrett lives one block away from this site. Mr. Garrett was not aware of components discussed within this project until this meeting. Mr. Garrett spoke about skepticism from local Long Island City residents with regard to the true commitment to the arts, although, it appears to be more apparent. Mr. Garrett discussed the concern about the density of the project and spoke about developing this project under the current zoning laws as a protection to the neighborhood.

Mr. Tom Paino

Mr. Paino has been a resident of Long Island City for approximately 20 years. He said that he has participated in many planning proposals in this community and was an active participant in the current zoning. Mr. Paino is opposed to this project with regard to its current design and said the project does not respect the current zoning.

Mr. Paino spoke about the careful decision made with regard to the towers developed within the Queens West Project while protecting the existence and importance of 5^th Street. The comparisons of buildings offered within the visual presentation are completely out of scale with regard to the future and existing development of what the zoning intends.

This particular block is sensitive since it is the only upland park in Queens West that is open to the upland community. Many in the community wanted the buildings to be even lower in order to avoid casting a shadow onto the park. The current project would obstruct the visual access of the park. The proposed building is completely out of character with regard to the existing community and the recently adopted zoning laws.

Mr. Paino explained that the neighborhood “suffers” from one of the worst open space ratio in this City. The 2030 Plan recommends that there be 2.5 acres per thousand people. The minimum target is 1.5 acres per thousand people. This community harbors at 1.05 acres per thousand people.

Mr. Paino is opposed to the height of the proposed buildings, not CUNY or Queens Council for the Arts as neighbors.

Professor Roger Hart

Professor Hart has been a resident of Long Island City for 30 years and has also been a professor at the Graduate Center for 30 years.

Professor Hart is concerned as a resident of the area with regard to the confusion of the development of the Queens West Project. Before the Project was approved, the community developed a model of the Project and met with city planners and Community Board Members. The concern that was most discussed was the exclusion of the average residents.

Professor Hart spoke about finding a solution to attracting faculty to this City and stated that this development would be a solution. He said that his specialty is Public Space and this project offers an excellent solution to public space that is accessible to all. Professor Hart said that he is impressed by the design of the project.

Mr. Doug Otto

Mr. Otto owns property in Long Island City that is approximately 100 feet from this project.

Mr. Otto stated that this is an exciting project with regard to the input from the Community Board, particularly from the Land Use Committee, however, this project “has a long way to go before it would be acceptable to the neighborhood”. Mr. Otto explained three observations that he has as to why his comment is true.

The zoning efforts that Mr. Paino spoke about deserve respect. It was a very long process and a consensus was built in the community. The central concern was that 5^th Street would be the line between the Queens West Project and the uplands of Long Island City. Now the first major project proposed would be allowed zoning for a 160 foot tall building. It is unfair to discuss that the context is different and that Annabelle Basin would be developed in a similar way in the future since that project is not under development right now.

Mr. Otto is a strong supporter of the arts and the City University of New York, however, this project has been presented due to the benefits that can be provided and the programs that are planned. This project is in need of a Community Benefit Agreement that states that the Applicants would follow through on their offers.

A gentleman said heis a property owner in Long Island City. He expressed his concern for the inundation of parking in the neighborhood. Commuters drive into Long Island City and park their cars on a daily basis to travel to Manhattan via the subway. He said that an underground garage would be needed for these commuters should this project begin. Cars are parked on both sides of 5^th Street and have been damaged by moving cars due to the narrow roadway (side view mirrors, etc.)

Mr. Conley asked for Mr. Valgora to respond to this comment.

Mr. Valgora explained that there are 90 parking spaces offered within this development. The garage would be half a level down and half a level up which allows the design to offer stoop gardens. The cars are not visible when parked. Parked cars would be hidden. This is a far more expensive addition to the proposal than allowing space for street parking.

Mr. Valgora explained that graduate students don’t usually have cars. The faculty rarely has cars either. The parking component was included into the design for the residential portion of the project. The entrances and egresses are separate. Mr. Galgora explained that the difficult issue regarding the lack of parking in Queens was taken into consideration for this design.

Number of Proposed Units

A Committee Member inquired about the population of the community.

The Market Rate Housing: 188 Units

The Graduate Residence: 201 Units

Faculty Townhomes 12 Units

The Committee Member inquired about the number of units (401) being developed an only 90 available parking spaces.

The zoning resolution recognizes the fundamental distinction between community facilities parking requirements and residential parking requirements.

The parking requirement for a community facility, which is what the Graduate Center is, is very low. The parking requirements for a residential facility are 50%. However, there is no parking requirement for this site.

Ms. Penny Lee spoke about parking regulations that were adopted in 1995 for a broad section of Long Island City, which extends to 39^th Street. The regulations were eliminated all parking requirements, therefore, this particular site is allowed up to 100% parking of the units.

Ms. Margaret Farrell

Ms. Farrell is a member of the CUNY Graduate Center and has been a resident in Sunnyside and Woodside for approximately seven years. Ms. Farrell lives in a studio apartment and the rent is very high. Ms. Farrell has always hoped for a residence for graduate students such as the project proposes.

Ms. Farrell is also a musician and is the Concert Manager for the Music Department at the Graduate Center. Ms. Farrell is very involved in the arts.

She stated that she knows very few graduate students who own cars. It is rare for graduate students to own cars.

Shadows

A Committee Member inquired about the discussion of shadows. As a requirement for a BSA Application, extensive shadow studies were conducted. The only shadows that would be cast by the building would be during the winter season early in the morning. It does not appear to be a primary use time at the park. It does not impact the park during any other time of the year.

Mr. Bernard Callegari

Mr. Callegari attended the February Community Board Meeting to discuss the demolition contractor hired for this project. The demolition contractor, North American Demo, has been indicted in the past for dumping asbestos in Long Island City. Since the February meeting, O’Connor Properties announced that the contractor under discussion was no longer working on this project. Mr. Callegari has spoken to the Applicant privately with regard to the new demolition contractor that has been hired. The new contractor is Recycling Unlimited. Mr. Callegari offered a bio of the contractor to the Board Members. Included in his researched material were pictures, permits, etc. of other projects. Mr. Callegari announced that Unlimited and North American Demo is one in the same company. Mr. Callegari had photographs of Mr. Schwab, the principle of North American Demo on the jobsite under discussion, dictating to the workers at that site. Mr. Callegari also stated that he believed that there is currently a Stop Work Order against this site however there was a machine operating on the site on April 3^rd 2008 which was the day of this meeting.

Mr. Callegari is in favor of building as long as it is a project that would give back to the community. The incentives discussed do not appear to give back to the community according to Mr. Callegari. Mr. Callegari explained that the demolition contractor has a criminal history with countless violations issued against him and his business(es). Mr. Callegari encouraged the Attendees to conduct their own research on this contractor. Mr. Callegari also stated that the remediation contractor is based in New Jersey and stated that a remediation project as intense as this one should have a remediation contractor from New York as well as jobs for this project should be offered to residents of Queens, particularly residents of Community Board 2. The jobs should offer health care and pay a living wage.

Mr. Conley explained that once Mr. Callegari brought this information before the Community Board, the Community Board immediately contacted the Applicant.

A representative of O’Connor Capital Partners

The rep addressed Mr. Callegari’s concerns with regard to the demolition contractor working at this site. He stated that Mr. Callegari was misinformed.

Originally, the Applicant was under contract with a firm called North American Demolition Company. That company held valid permits and conducted demolition on 5^th Street without any incident or health issues to the community.

When the Applicant was informed of the principle’s prior actions, the Applicant made the determination to remove the contractor from the project. A number of companies are under consideration however, the Applicant has not engaged any company to date for demolition. Some of the former workers inquired about the Applicant’s consideration for work on the project. Recycling Unlimited is not under contract with the Applicant. There are no permits to any company for the demolition of remaining structures. There was regret that such representation would be made about the Applicant and that the Applicant would misinform this group. The Applicant is going out to bid for the project on a best bid basis.

There is no Stop Work Order on this project.

Mr. Matthew Quigley

Mr. Quigley, of Plaxall spoke about this Application. Plaxall is one block away from this site. Mr. Quigley stated that Plaxall also has a pending project in Long Island City. Plaxall has worked with Mr. Goldman and Mr. Valgora in the past. Plaxall has its own interests in this project and are in support of it.

Plaxall, and the Applicant, have tried to consider what is best for the community and have worked to be the “anti-Queens West” with regard to giving back to the community by avoiding the development of high-rise parking lots that face the community but, instead, designing parking spaces to be hidden and have the townhouses face the street. These incentives, which were designed with the best interest of the community in mind, cost a lot of money.

Mr. Quigley spoke about environmental costs and how it is not economically feasible to develop small buildings while making the project profitable.

Mr. Andrew Kirby

Mr. Kirby, of Plaxall agreed with the statement made by his cousin, Matthew Quigley. Mr. Kirby stated that this project is “a homerun for Long Island City”. The project would bring a dynamic, diverse population of students and faculty to the area. The residents would be involved with the community.

This project would now force the clean-up of a highly polluted site and eliminates industrial buildings that have limited use. It also brings a very important art institution into the area, provides a public performance space for artists and supports the arts within the community.

The Applicant has taken a great deal of time to consider the architecture of the project in a way that would compliment the history of the community. Mr. Kirby stated that the height of the buildings presented within this project, relative to Queens West building height, is not a problem.

Mr. Conley has closed the Public Comment section for this item.

In the Matter of an Application for a Dual Street Renaming; a/k/a William D. Modell Wayat the Southeast and Southwest Corners of Jackson Avenue

and Queens Boulevard.

Mr. Conley asked Mr. Stephen Cooper, to Chair this portion of the meeting because this request was brought before the Community Board by Mr. Joseph Conley.

Mr. Cooper stated that this request was voted on by the Land Use Committee and the Committee vote unanimously In Favor of this Application.

Mr. Cooper stated that Mr. Modell was a very active person in Western Queens as well as the City of New York for at least 40 years.

The Land Use Committee voted in favor to recommend that the Full Board vote In Favor of this Application.

Mr. Cooper then asked for a Motion from Board Members to approve the Application for a Dual Street Renaming a/k/a William D. Modell Way at the Southeast and Southwest Corners of Jackson Avenue and Queens Boulevard. Mr. Conley stated that he included a letter as well as a bio about William D. Modell.

A Motion was made In Favor of an Application for a Dual Street Renaming a/k/a William D. Modell Way at the Southeast and Southwest Corners of Jackson Avenue and Queens Boulevard. The Motion was Seconded.

In Favor 31 Opposed 0 Abstention 0

A Roll Call Vote was taken with regard to this Application. The vote for this Application was unanimous In Favor.

Chairperson present but not voting.

Conversion of Barnett Avenue to a One Way Westbound from Woodside Avenue to 39^th Avenue, and Request for Speed Bumps to be Placed at the Following Locations between Skillman Avenue and 39^th Avenue:

45th Street

46th Street

49th Street

50th Street

51st Street

Mr. Conley stated that the following recommendations have been requested and recommended by members of the community. Commissioner McCarthy has spent many cold winter days surveying the area with Mr. Conley in an effort to improve various neighborhood traffic locations. The Department of Transportation has compiled short term and long term solutions.

Mr. Conley stated that there was an error printed on a flyer that was distributed throughout the neighborhood. There were no Speed Bumps planned for 39^th Street.

Commissioner McCarthy stated that she has received approximately 45 e-mails from members of the Sunnyside Community on this day and has worked to answer all of them.

Commissioner McCarthy explained that this is a public process and no decisions have been made. Commissioner McCarthy has come to this meeting to obtain feedback from the community and listen to ideas. She stated that the DOT has received a lot of complaints about speeding from both elected officials as well as community members. The DOT has been contacted with regard to need for sidewalks along Barnett Avenue between 48^th Street and 52^nd Street.

Commissioner McCarthy spoke about the streets listed on this Agenda with regard to requests for speed bumps. Prior to a site visits in March with elected officials, the DOT, the City Council President, the DOT conducted studies for speed bumps on each of the streets listed.

Commissioner McCarthy spoke about Barnett Avenue, Skillman Avenue and 43^rd Avenue. She said that the DOT is recommending to calm the traffic, signal timing modifications, speed bumps, and constructing a sidewalk and curb along Barnett Avenue between 48^th Street and 52^nd Street.

At the end of March, the DOT changed the signal timing along the entire corridor of 43^rd Avenue and the entire corridor of Skillman Avenue. Vehicle traffic travel time along those two corridors would increase. This is to reduce speeding and allow pedestrian crossing would then increase safely.

Speed surveys have been conducted for all the streets listed on this Agenda. The DOT’s survey determined that all but one street did experience speeding. The only street that did not show speeding as a problem was 46^th Street. During the site visit in March, residents of 46^th Street were disappointed with the results of the survey. The DOT conducted another survey for that location, and the results proved that speeding was occurring on 46^th Street. There was a speed bump installed on 47^th Street in December 2006.

Commissioner McCarthy defined speeding. The speed limit in New York City on non-highway streets is 35 miles per hour. That is based on the 85^th percentile of speed on those city streets. Therefore, 15% of vehicles are driving faster than 30 miles per hour and 85% of vehicles are driving faster than 30 miles per hour.

On most of the streets surveyed, the speed limit showed vehicles traveling at 31, 32, 35 miles per hour. Commissioner McCarthy did not want the community to believe that vehicles are traveling at a speed of 50 miles per hour on side streets but in fact, driving above the speed limit allowed.

Commissioner McCarthy stated that speed bumps can be noisy but they do slow down traffic. Vehicles should not drive over those bumps at a high speed. Commissioner McCarthy stated that these bumps should be approved and installed since drivers attempt to avoid the speed bump on 47^th Street and use alternatives streets that do not have speed bumps.

Commissioner McCarthy spoke about Capital Funds for the construction of the sidewalks and curbs for Barnett Avenue. The cost is approximately $2 million dollars however; the construction was not added until 2012. Commissioner McCarthy explained why. The DEP is planning to repair water mains in that area and would essentially need to tear up those streets. Commissioner McCarthy explained that the short term solution would be to convert Barnett Avenue into a One Way street westbound. Commissioner McCarthy stated that of all the e-mails received by community members with regard to this conversion were opposed to this modification. Commissioner McCarthy explained that choosing to convert the street westbound would enable the entire length of street to travel in one direction to avoid any vehicles meeting head on versus converting only one or two blocks into a One Way direction. There is a light at 48^th Street that has potential for a head on collision should the street only be partially converted.

The DOT received many complaints from residents who live in the Phipps area with regard to the inconvenience of the converted direction of Barnett Avenue. Commissioner McCarthy stated that the DOT then suggested converting the street into a One Way street eastbound to avoid any conflict from 48^th Street to Woodside Avenue. Commissioner McCarthy suggested that the community consider this option.

The DOT seeks to convert Barnett Avenue into a One Way street in order to add parking on the north side of the street as well as a temporary sidewalk along the building side of the businesses for the safety of pedestrians. The parked cars would act as a buffer for the pedestrians. The street is only 26 feet wide.

Commissioner McCarthy spoke about the misconceptions and anger with regard to those who learned of the proposal recently. She stated that her attendance at this meeting is to answer questions and address concerns or suggestions that would be considered by the DOT.

A Committee Member stated he has observed that the modifications of the traffic signals on 43^rd Avenue and Skillman Avenue, to date, have proven successful. This Committee Member stated however, that should Barnett Avenue be converted into a One Way street, vehicles are going to be tempted to speed on that street unless the DOT focuses on controlling the speed limit on that street as well.

Mr. Conley stated that traffic calming and slowing down the speed of traffic was the result of community requests. A community member brought this problem to Mr. Conley’s attention.

A Community Member inquired about how the DOT identifies the speed bumps in the area. Commissioner McCarthy explained that a yellow sign is erected on the corner of the street that shows the speed limit (15 miles per hour) and the speed bump itself is then identified with painting on the road right before the actual location of the speed bump.

A Committee Member spoke about streets with speed bumps and traffic signals. Traffic appears to speed after passing the speed bump in order to make the light. This Committee Member inquired about the criteria of the location that a speed bump is placed. Commissioner McCarthy explained that the DOT determines the amount of driveways and a safe distance for the vehicle to reduce speed in order to drive over the bump safely. Some blocks may be too short however; some blocks have had two speed bumps added.

A Committee Member asked about the typical observations of the DOT to determine the need for a speed bump. Should vehicles drive 31-36 miles per hour, does that qualify that street the need for a speed bump? No. The decision is at the discretion of the Borough Commissioner. At some instances, the Commissioner would leave the decision up to the community.

A Committee Member spoke about the 25 years of concerns expressed by the community with regard to 48^th Street between Skillman Avenue and Northern Boulevard. This Committee Member explained that cars are not the only vehicles that speed in this area; trucks and buses are speeding as well. It has been discussed that the DOT would not add speed bumps in this area because of the truck and bus traffic. Is there anyway to eliminate that policy in order to add speed bumps in this area? Commissioner McCarthy explained that the DOT has a policy against truck routes and bus routes because certain trucks and buses are too low to the ground. 48^th Street is not a truck route. Commissioner McCarthy explained that 48^th Street is wider than 50 feet and for safety reason, the DOT does not add speed bumps on streets that wide. She stated that the DOT can conduct a survey of this area.

A Committee Member inquired about a request for a speed bump on 38^th Street. The DOT denied this request due to the large amount of driveways on that street. This Committee Member inquired about alternative signage for that street. Commissioner McCarthy explained that speed limit signs are not added to any side streets within the city. The universal speed limit for side streets in this city is 35 miles per hour. All motorists should be and must be aware of this law.

Commissioner McCarthy spoke about Ms. Stacey Rawlins, the DOT’s liaison for this area. Ms. Rawlins has been taking notes regarding this presentation and will be addressing the community’s concerns and inquiries. Ms. Rawlins would research 48^th Street and Skillman Avenue.

A Committee Member inquired about a No Trucking Sign on 48^th Avenue. This was requested by the Community Board years ago and the DOT erected the sign on 47^th Street and refused to relocate the sign.

A Committee Member stated that Skillman Avenue and 51^st Street is, most likely, the busiest intersection on Skillman Avenue. There have been many accidents at this location. There is a firehouse on 52^nd Street and there are concerns about erecting a light at this location for fear of a vehicle driving down Skillman Avenue with the right-of-way for the traffic signal and colliding with fire trucks in route to an emergency. Commissioner McCarthy explained that should a signal study confirm that there is a need for a traffic signal at that intersection; the DOT is legally obligated to add the signal. There is no Agency, including the FDNY that can prevent the addition of a traffic signal.

A Committee Member explained that there are no pedestrians crossing the streets that are listed on this Agenda and are under discussion for the addition of speed bumps, however, Barnett Avenue from 48^th Street and 50^th Street has a curve with a speed bump. There is a lot of pedestrian traffic on 39^th Drive which is located near a playground. The community has been asking for a speed bump on this street for years. The DOT has stated that the street is too short for a speed bump. This Committee Member stated that Barnett Avenue is shorter that 39^th Drive. Commissioner McCarthy stated that this location would be surveyed.

Commissioner McCarthy spoke about the design of Barnett Avenue when the conversion takes place. The traffic flow for Barnett Avenue would remain a One Way street; however, it is a community decision.

Public Comment

Dorothy A. Cavallo

Ms. Cavallo is Co-President of the Phipps Tenant Association and a Board Member of the Sunnyside Gardens Community Association. Ms. Cavallo has been a resident of Sunnyside for 50 years.

The Public Hearing Notice has had an adverse affect on Phipps Houses. S. Cavallo spoke about the “clockwise” traffic flow pattern around the Gardens. Services received in this area such as Department of Transportation, United States Post Office, United Parcel Service, etc., would be effected by the modifications discussed. The buildings in the Phipps Houses are identified by letters versus numbers and that is how mail is sorted. An e-mail was sent to the Board Members from Ms. Cavallo and her Co-President with regard to their opposition to converting Barnett Avenue into a One Way street. Ms. Cavallo stated that it wasn’t clear whether a copy of that e-mail was included in the Board Members’ packets therefore she read the e-mail to the Attendees at this meeting.

Ms. Cavallo thanked Mr. Ciaran Staunton for his participation on behalf of the community with regard to this issue.

Ms. Cavallo spoke about the inconvenience that residents who lease space in the parking lot or for those who live on the 52^nd Street side of the complex would experience. The effect that the eastbound modification would cause for residents would be an extra 12 blocks of driving as well as five traffic lights and one stop sign in order to get to and from their homes. Ms. Cavallo recommended that the street be converted into a One Way street eastbound. There was discussion about widening the street to its full width of 60 feet. Ms. Cavallo mentioned that 48^th Street to 50^th Street that does not have a sidewalk.

Mr. Conley asked Ms. Cavallo about the possibility of converting Barnett Avenue eastbound from 48^th Street and Woodside Avenue. Ms. Cavallo was encouraged by that suggestion but did state that residents have expressed great concern about the increase in traffic volume on 39^th Avenue should Barnett Avenue traffic flow was modified.

William Eichhorn

Mr. Eichhorn stated that Ms. Cavallo introduced most of his concerns. Mr. Eichhorn has been a resident of Sunnyside and the Phipps Houses for 60 years and is the Treasurer of the Tenants Association as well as a member of the Board of Directors for the Community Association.

Mr. Eichhorn stated that the organization of this community have been working closely with Councilperson Eric Gioia as well as the DOT for many years with regard to the issue(s) discussed at this meeting. Mr. Eichhorn spoke about the abuse and neglect that Barnett Avenue has suffered with regard to dumping especially since the addition of the Stop and Shop Supermarket and the Home Depot as well as other stores along 48^th Street. Mr. Eichhorn stated that the discussion with regard to Barnett Avenue being converted into a one way street from 48^th Street to 50^th Street heading westbound would have a minimal impact on Phipps Houses.

Ms. Eichhorn expressed his disappointed as a resident of Phipps Houses, as a community member and a member of several civic organizations, with regard to not being informed, kept apprised or consulted within any previous discussions regarding this conversion. Mr. Eichhorn stated that he is in opposition to the one way conversion for the entire length of Barnett Avenue up to Woodside Avenue. He suggested that the one way street should be converted westbound from 48^th Street to 50^th Street for safety purposes.

Ciaran Staunton

Mr. Staunton is a resident of 46^th Street and is the father of two children. He has been working on the issue of Barnett Avenue for “quite some time”. Mr. Staunton and residents of the area have cleaned up that area on numerous occasions. Members of the community have removed garbage that has ranged from refrigerators to diapers and condoms. The clean-up efforts continue every two to three months. Mr. Staunton spoke about the community’s’ communications with Mr. Conley and the DOT. Mr. Staunton stated that an area in the condition of Barnett Avenue would never be found on the Upper West Side or any other community in any other District. He stated that this community “deserves better”. Mr. Staunton explained that the only two elected officials that visited and surveyed the condition of Barnett Avenue were Assemblywoman Marge Markey and Council Speaker Christine Quinn. Each of these ladies both agreed that this area is not acceptable. Mr. Staunton also thanked Assemblywoman Cathy Nolan and Mr. Conley for arranging such a forum since the residents attempted for years to get someone to hear their needs.

Mr. Staunton explained that the residents of the area should not and cannot be held responsible for cleaning up Barnett Avenue every two to three months. Mr. Staunton challenged anyone who would like to stand on Barnett Avenue and say, “This is my neighborhood and I think it is lovely.”

During the walk-through survey with Assemblywoman Markey and Council Speaker Quinn, the residents explained that the number one priority is safety. The residents discussed people walking along Barnett Avenue with shopping carts, baby strollers, etc. The second priority is to have the area cleaned-up for the last time; the sooner the better. The proposal to create sidewalks in 2012 is too long for the residents of the area. Mr. Staunton spoke about converting different streets into One Way streets other than Barnett Avenue.

Mr. Staunton also spoke about speed bumps. Mr. Staunton has compiled a petition signatures from residents of 46^th Street that shows 88% are in favor of the speed bump addition. Mr. Staunton is in strong favor of speed bumps for the safety of his two young children.

Tonia Moore

Ms. Moore is a resident of 46^th Street and has been a Sunnyside resident for approximately 11 years. Ms. Moore has two children.

Ms. Moore spearheaded a petition in the fall of 2007 for the addition of speed bumps on 46^th Street between 39^th Avenue and Skillman Avenue. Ms. Moore provided the petition for Board Members at this meeting. The signatures were in favor of the speed bump with 88% of the residents of 46^th Street signing in favor; 7% of the residents were in opposition and 5% of the residents were unavailable for signature after several attempts. Ms. Moore explained that there are over 30 children live on 46^th Street and the majority of those children are under 8 years old. Ms. Moore described the dangers of families getting in and out of their cars while cars are speeding down the street. Ms. Moore addressed the observation of vehicles accelerating after a speed bump to catch the green traffic light however the vehicles would not be at complete acceleration for the entire length of the street if speed bumps were added. Ms. Moore is in disagreement with the DOT’s surveys that vehicles are driving at a speed of 35 miles per hour. Ms. Moore invited anyone to conduct a survey on 46^th Street again. Northern Boulevard and Queens Boulevard are helping to increase the speeding traffic on 46^th Street. Ms. Moore has a neighbor on 47^th Street who has had a speed bump added to that street and e-mailed the Community Board on the day of this meeting stating that since the addition of the speed bump, 47^th Street has been safer and quieter.

Ms. Moore stated that it would be important to add these speed bumps not only on 46^th Street but on other streets in Sunnyside Gardens.

Liz Reynolds

Ms. Reynolds is the President of Harrison Place Homeowners Association. The residents of this organization are in opposition of the one way restriction along Barnett Avenue.

Ms. Reynolds discussed the flyer that was distributed throughout the community. This Association consists of 83 homes along 39^th Avenue from 47^th Street to 52^nd Street and on 48^th and 49^th Street in the block off of 39^th Avenue. These homeowners are to be the residents most affected by this conversion on Barnett Avenue. This would transfer traffic onto 39^th Avenue, which is the major residential street in the vicinity of the large neighborhood playground, Sunnyside Park. Residents need to use Barnett Avenue in both directions to drive around for parking and to reach the only parking lot within the neighborhood. A One Way direction on Barnett Avenue would add to traffic, pollution, noise and frustration.

Ms. Reynolds spoke about an e-mail that she wrote to over 200 residents in the neighborhood. Ms. Reynolds has received only one response in opposition to the Association’s position on this matter.

Ms. Reynolds said that Barnett Avenue has been neglected for too long. She added that Barnett Avenue needs to be properly paved. Ms. Reynolds suggested immediate repairs including the widening of Barnett Avenue, which narrows behind Sunnyside Park and filling the potholes along the parking strip along the north side of Barnett Avenue between 50^th Street and 51^st Street. These potholes are preventing vehicles from parking on those two streets. The Avenue is in need of painted lines clearly outlining the appropriating parking spaces along the north side of Barnett Avenue where there is no curb. Parking tickets have been issued for “parking on a sidewalk” on a street that clearly has no curb or sidewalk.

Mr. Conley inquired about Ms. Reynolds’ opinion about a Barnett Avenue traffic conversion of a one way street east bound from 48^th Street to Woodside Avenue. Ms. Reynolds explained that the residents have agreed that the Association is in opposition of any conversion.

Herbert Reynolds

Mr. Reynolds is the President of the Sunnyside Gardens Preservation Alliance. Mr. Reynolds spoke about contacting the organizations e-mail list which consists of approximately 300-400 addresses in the neighborhood. The response from this list has been unanimously opposed to the conversion of Barnett Avenue.

Mr. Reynolds spoke about his contact with Commissioner McCarthy and stated that the Commissioner has been receptive to the community. Mr. Reynolds mentioned that the Commissioner has clearly received more e-mails that the Alliance has received.

He explained that having Barnett Avenue as a two way street assists to relieve the pressure of traffic within the neighborhood on 39^th Avenue. Traffic must be taken away from 39^th Avenue.

Mr. Reynolds spoke about how members of his homeowners association extend from 47^th Street to 52^nd Street. The Association has not been contacted by any resident seeking the addition of a speed bump on any of those streets. However, there has been opposition expressed due to the anticipation of noise when vehicles drive over the bumps, then speeding once reaching 39^th Avenue and Skillman Avenue, etc. Mr. Reynolds explained that there are advantages and disadvantages to the addition of speed bumps.

Mr. Reynolds spoke about the heavy traffic on 48^th Street.

Mr. Conley inquired about Mr. Reynolds’ opinion with regard to converting traffic on Barnett Avenue One Way eastbound. Mr. Reynolds stated that by making this conversion, traffic would be forced onto more “fragile” streets. Mr. Reynolds stated he is in opposition of directional changes in traffic short term or long term however; Mr. Reynolds did speak in favor of immediate street improvements.

Angus Grieve-Smith

Mr. Smith is a resident of 51^st Street in the Sunny Hill Complex and is the father of a five-year old son. Mr. Smith spoke about the Safer Skillman Avenue Project which has its own website; saferskillman.org.

Mr. Smith thanked Commissioner McCarthy and her staff for the modifications to the traffic signals in the neighborhood. He stated that Commissioner McCarthy is “much more safety minded” than our last Commissioner and that the neighborhoods are to expect a lot more safety improvements as a result of Commissioner McCarthy’s efforts and as long as the Commissioner continues to receive Mayor Bloomberg’s support. Mr. Smith thanked Mr. Conley and Ms. Eagan for their dedicated efforts as well.

Mr. Smith was pleased with the information compiled for the Barnett Avenue conversion and the speed bump requests and the involvement of the community on such issues. He explained that safety issues should unite neighborhoods and suggested the development of a workshop for pedestrian safety in Sunnyside and Woodside. Mr. Smith suggested narrowing Skillman Avenue by either adding bicycle lanes or angle parking and suggested that joining the DOT and the residents to discuss conflicts and create a safety plan. Mr. Conley agreed with this suggestion.

Mr. Smith spoke about traffic flow after the conversion of Barnett Avenue and suggested consulting traffic experts about the possibility of forcing traffic congestion onto other streets into the area.

Mary Caulfield

Ms. Caulfield has been a resident of the Phipps Gardens for her entire life. The entire area has grown enormously beyond the capacity of what the area is accustomed to. Ms. Caulfield spoke about the speculation of what would happen should the Barnett Avenue conversion take place. Ms. Caulfield’s windows face 39^th Avenue and 51^st Street. She stated that the location is noisy and busy with deliveries, vehicle traffic and heavy pedestrian traffic. Increasing vehicular traffic would cause a great amount of accidents.

Ms. Caulfield spoke about the traffic that is overflowing from the businesses on Northern Boulevard. She spoke about keeping all the traffic for businesses on the other side of Northern Boulevard. The reason why all the Northern Boulevard traffic seeps into the residential area is because 37^th Avenue is cut off between Woodside Avenue and 48^th Street. There is as parking lot at that location. Ms. Caulfield suggested opening up 37^th Avenue by way of that parking lot which would allow Northern Boulevard traffic to flow without encroaching into the residential streets.

Deidre Feerick

Ms. Feerick agreed with Ms. Caulfield’s recommendation to open up 37^th Avenue. Ms. Feerick commended Commissioner McCarthy on her suggestion to convert Barnett Avenue into a One Way street. Ms. Feerick said that she is opposed to speed bumps.

An Attendee inquired about the addition of a sidewalk at Barnett Avenue. A permanent sidewalk would not be added until 2012 however, converting the street into a one way street and offering a safer location for pedestrians to walk was discussed.

Mr. Conley explained why the DOT would not add a permanent sidewalk on Barnett Avenue until 2012. The street is slated for sewer repair in 2012 that entails ripping up the streets. The DOT also must determine where the street ends and the new sidewalk is to begin. The curbs must be added before the sidewalks are added.

Mr. Conley stated that the Community Board office has received e-mails with regard to the community’s position on this item. According to the e-mails received at the CB2 office, the community is in opposition of the conversion. The tally with regard to the opinion of the community was 1 in favor and 26 opposed. Mr. Conley stated that this response prompted the scheduling of this Public Hearing with the DOT.

There were e-mails written to the Community Board with regard to speed bumps. There were approximately 10 e-mails sent in opposition especially for 45^th Street and 46^th Street. There were no specific e-mails discussing 49^th Street or 50^th Street, however, those comments may have been included within the general opinions offered by the community.

Mr. Conley encouraged the DOT to add a speed bump on 46^th Street. The community has requested this improvement on that street for many years.

A Committee Member suggested stronger police presence. Mr. Conley explained that police presence is temporary; the community is seeking a permanent solution.

A Committee Member spoke about 46^th Street and 43^rd Avenue as a dangerous intersection that experiences a lot of traffic accidents.

A Committee Member expressed concern about the width of the sidewalk on Barnett Avenue.

A Committee Member addressed Commissioner McCarthy with regard to enforcement of the right turn only lane on 45^th Street. A speed bump should not be placed at this location.

* * * * *

A Motion was made to recommend the addition of a speed bump on 46^th Street from 39^th Avenue to Skillman Avenue, as requested by the residents of that street, however to “drop” all the rest of the requested locations in recognition of no support from the residents of those streets. The Motion was Seconded.

In Favor 31 Opposed 0 Abstention 0

The Motion was passed In Favor by a unanimous show of hands.

** * * *

A Motion was to Table this discussion since a solution to this problem has not yet been met. The Motion was seconded.

Mr. Conley thanked Commissioner McCarthy for her attendance at this meeting. Mr. Conley also thanked Ms. Stacey Rawlins who is very involved in the District Services Cabinet Meetings as well as the City Services and Public Safety Committee Meetings. Ms. Rawlins is always so responsive to Community Board 2.

Attendance

32 Board Members Present – 5 Board Members Absent

Chairperson’s Report

Introduction of Two New Board Members
Mr. Conley introduced Ms. Sheila Lewandowski, a Long Island City reside and the founder of the Chocolate Factory. Ms. Lewandowski has become the newest Board Member of Community Board 2.

* * * * *

Mr. Conley introduced Mr. Marvin Jeffcoat to the Community Board Members. Mr. Jeffcoat is also a new Member of the Community Board. Mr. Jeffcoat would be Mr. Ron Casey’s successor and will act as a liaison for the Veterans of the area.

Thanking Board Members for Perfect Attendance

Mr. Conley thanked the following Board Members for perfect attendance:

Ms. Jean Carubia
Ms. Lisa Deller
Mr. Richard Gundlach
Ms. Ellen Kang has also recently been reappointed to the Board.
Ms. Dorothy Morehead
Ms. Carol Terrano

Mr. Conley stated that the Community Board has requested that several Board Members be removed from the Board due to lack of attendance. The Community Board continues to recruit new members who would like to take an active roll in their community.

Approval of Minute

A Motion was made to Approve the Community Board 2 Monthly Meeting and Public Hearing. The Motion was Seconded. Approval of the Minutes for the February 2008 Community Board 2 Monthly Meeting was unanimously approved.

Community Board 2 Member, Marilyn Elseroad King

Mr. Conley stated that the he has been working with the Department of Transportation to honor Ms. King at one of the subway stations in Long Island City. Currently, the DOT has denied this request however; Mr. Conley would continue this quest in honor of Marilyn Elseroad King.

Ms. King who passed away last month was a dedicated Board Member and Chairperson of the Transportation Committee and a Community Board Member since 1984.

Mr. Conley asked for a moment of silence at this meeting to remember Ms. King and her hard work and dedication over the years.

Triangle in Woodside

The BSA Application has been postponed until May 6^th 2008.

Hunters Point South

A Public Hearing has been scheduled at Citibank on April 24^th. Mr. Conley announced that reminders would be sent.

Committee Reports

Mr. Conley encouraged the Board Members to review the March Minutes for the Committees Meetings.

City Services and Public Safety Committee Meeting

Mr. O’Brien stated that an Application has come before the Committee with regard to 43-04 Vernon Boulevard. This establishment plans to file for a Restaurant Wine License. This location has been the subject of great controversy in the past. There will be a Public Hearing scheduled.

47-15 Barnett Avenue. This location also plans to file for a Liquor License and is scheduled to come before the City Services and Public Safety Committee in May. This location has also been the topic of great controversy in the past as well.

Detective Glenn Yule

Mr. Conley announced that Detective Glenn Yule has retired from the NYPD after 15 years of dedicated service. Detective Yule has become the Director of the Sunnyside BID. Mr. Conley presented Detective Yule with a plaque thanking him for his 15 years of service. Detective Yule thanked Mr. Conley for the presentation and acknowledgement of his services.

Detective Yule spoke about his recent reassignment to Patrol Borough Queens North by the NYPD. Detective Yule stated that he retired from the NYPD because he wanted return to the area that he loves. Detective Yule has spent 15 years in Community Board 2 District. Detective Yule thank all present for their hard work and dedication within the community.

District Manager’s Report

There was no report offered at this meeting.

City Planning Report

There was no report offered at this meeting.

COMMITTEE REPORTS

Environment Committee

There was no report offered at this Meeting.

Youth Services Planning Committee

There was no report offered at this Meeting.

City Services and Public Safety Committee

There was no report offered at this Meeting.

Land Use Committee

Vote on 5-11 47^th Street; BSA Application #238-07 BZ

Ms. Deller explained that this Application has been on the Land Use Committee Agenda for a long time.

O’Connor Partners is proposing 188 units of Market Rate Housing, 201 units of Graduate Student Housing, and 12 faculty townhouses with a total of 401 units. The developer has not made clear what the distribution of those units actually are in terms of one, two or three bedroom units. Ms. Deller asked Mr. Valgora to provide that information. There are 87 parking spaces for the total project.

Ms. Deller stated that given the unit count, the community is to expect 1,000 more residents moving into the community as a result of this project.

There is a six story graduate residence for CUNY graduate students as well as a thirteen story Market Rate Residence building.

The Land Use Committee has not opposed the six story graduate center residence building since it is not extremely different from the requirements of the current zoning. However, the market rate building on the corner has been proposed to stand at twice the height the current zoning would allow.

The use of the courtyard has been modified. There would be an open space for the community to utilize. Initially, there was a facility for a health center. The proposal has been modified to offer a home to the Queens Council for the Arts. This is an organization with a $1 million dollar budget that currently houses 800 square feet of space for operation. Ms. Deller commented that the organization is not strong financially and will need to raise money to build out the new space. This was discussed at the Land Use Committee Meeting. The organization is dependent on government grants for support. Ms. Deller explained that there is no guarantee that the Queens Council for the Arts could actually obtain the much needed funds in order to thrive successfully within this facility.

The Land Use Committee voted in favor to approve this Application with six attached contingencies.

1. A Deed Restriction is placed on the property which requires that the low rise buildings be used in perpetuity as housing for graduate students and faculty of CUNY only.

Queens Council for the Arts increases its outreach and service to Long Island City based artists.

The garden courtyard space remains open to the community from sunrise to dusk. The community is permitted to use the open space for passive recreation and neighborhood events.

The Community Board’s approval is subject to the agreement that 20% satisfied off affordable housing in the Market Rate building.

Should Brownfields Tax Credits become approved for this project, the developer would return a portion of the funding to the community in the form of funding for a public library or other community use.

CUNY would establish an ongoing mentoring relationship with local schools such as P.S. 78 and LaGuardia Community College.

Ms. Deller stated that this is the recommendation from the Land Use Committee to the Full Board of Community Board 2.

A Motion was made to approve the recommendation by the Land Use Committee. The Motion was Seconded.

There were comments regarding the requested Variance and zoning that was voted on and approved by the Community years ago.

A Committee Member commented on the number of units proposed versus the number of parking spaces proposed within this development in lieu of the nature of parking problems currently experienced in the area.

A Committee Member directed two questions toward the Applicants:

1. Would there be permanent housing or some degree of homeownership?

2. Would the Applicant be receptive to the addition of more parking spaces within this project?

There was discussion of projects that offer condominium outside of the Queens West development.

Mr. Valgora offered answers to the Committee Members on the two above-mentioned questions:

Mr. Valgora stated that the market will determine the type of housing offered.

Mr. Valgora explained that the current housing market is within an unprecedented state of turmoil in a decade. The use does not determine whether it is condominium or cooperative. The developer would decide in the most economic sense and that is very difficult to dictate since the market actually fluctuates week to week. This is not a question of zoning but residential. The decision would lean toward the most successful decision for the project.

Mr. Valgora stated that with regard to parking, this is the only project that he is aware of in this particular neighborhood that has proposed and offered interior parking. This portion of the project is clearly far more expensive than the parking solution at the Queens West development. That is why there is a five story exposed garage facing 5^th Street.

Mr. Valgora explained that it would be basically defeat the project financially, to add additional parking to this project. Mr. Valgora also stated that, to date, the parking at the Queens West development is not fully utilized.

Mr. Valgora also discussed that the Applicant has voluntarily proposed parking although this project does not require the provision of parking.

Mr. Valgora explained that the vast majority of the site has not been asked to be rezoned from the original Hunters Point rezoning; only a small portion on 5^th Street has been proposed. The Applicant worked closely with the Department of City Planning, who actually sponsored the rezoning in that area. The DCP worked very carefully with the Applicant through this process before the Applicant came before the Land Use Committee and the Full Community Board. The Department of City Planning reviewed the proposal before the Applicant presented this project to the Land Use Committee.

The environmental conditions of each site were not studied when zoning in these areas was adopted; therefore the conditions of the site under discussion were unknown. This site has an $8 million dollar clean-up cost that was not anticipated at the time of the zoning adoption.

There were questions about energy efficient measures within this project. The Applicant has requested for the development of a sustainable and green project in a way of becoming a “showcase project for Queens and Long Island City”. The Market Rate Residential building cannot be determined but it is being held at a very high standard. CUNY must submit their standards but it would be a Certified LEED Building. The architect is involved in a great amount of development in the Long Island City area. Energy use and efficiency in Queens is a critical issue.

A Committee Member spoke about the community’s concern for density within this project. They stated that there have been many diverse formations of the community offering recommendations and opinions about this project. Perhaps, CUNY is eager to place this project within the Long Island City community is because the students and the faculty has been priced out of areas such as Astoria and Brooklyn, as well as other places, while the reality is that in the absence of a significant 20% affordable housing component, the people of Long Island City are being priced out of their community. This certainty is a very important component within the development of this project.

With regard to the terms of the participation of the Queens Council for the Arts; that is a wonderful concept should it happen as an artistic component but this addition should not dictate the driving factor of approval by this Committee. However, this would be a nice addition or bonus.

The affordable housing discussion should not displace existing residence by the determination of a fluctuating market rate especially at the expense of residence already living in this area.

A Committee Member focused on the topic of parking. Mr. Valgora responded to this comment. This project is a “poster child” to the NYC Plan of 2030 since it is so close to the subway. Public transportation is a great incentive.

A Committee Member discussed that if the Community Board, the Land Use Committee and the District in general, opposes or does not approve of this Application, what would the alternatives of this site propose? The answer is, “there would not be developments on the site due to the costly clean-up”. The building is currently uninhabitable. Therefore, that building would remain vacant, uninhabitable and eyesore to the community. Should there development at that site, the Committee Member inquired as to what type of business could occupy that site that would be in the best interest of the community. This Committee Member explained that in order to cover the cost of the clean-up of this site, the community must allow for the sort of development on a large enough scale that could absorb such a cost. This Committee Member praised Mr. Valgora and his firm, CUNY would be a good neighbor and stated that the Queens Council for the Arts would hopefully be a great neighbor. There was concern expressed with regard to “pushing out current neighbors” however if this project does not move forward, another project would surely come along within the next few years and the community may not get what is being offered by this Applicant.

A Committee Member spoke about the positive impact that CUNY must have within the development of this project.

A Committee Member inquired about the definition of affordable housing. Ms. Deller explained rents are established according to the area median income as defined by HUD. For a family of four, housing affordable to a family earning 80% of AMI would be affordable to a family earning $56,000.

A Committee Member expressed concern about remediation and the Application for a Variance. Mr. Conley explained that currently there is no funding from the Brownfields Tax Credits. The Applicant has not received any funding to date, and should the Applicant receive funding, the Community Board has requested that some of that funding be brought back into the community. The Applicant has filed for Brownfields Tax Credits and has agreed to put some of that funding back into the community.

A Committee Member inquired about the discussion of a Stop Work Order against this site. The Applicant has submitted documents to Mr. Conley from the DOB with regard to this site. Mr. Conley reviewed the documents and explained that on March 3^rd 2008 a Full Stop Work Order was served due to failure to provide adequate protection for sidewalk during construction in front of 05-20 46^th Road which does not apply to this project. There is a list of valid permits posted at this site. Mr. Conley explained that there is no Stop Work Order issued for remediation.

According to the developer, both demolition companies have been terminated.

A Committee Member spoke about the open space that would be available to the community as well as Queens Council for the Arts. This Committee Member inquired as to how Queens Council for the Arts could be helpful to the artists and the art organizations of Long Island City. The rep from the Queens Council for the Arts explained that the organization is in partnership with many new groups such as State Parks. The organization is working to develop Gantry Park Summer Series as a pilot collaboration. QCA is also working with Plaxall. QCA has been spending a lot of time in Long Island City in order to learn the needs of the neighborhood.

A Motion was made to Approve the Application subject to the six stipulation stated by the Community Board. The Motion was Seconded.

A Roll Call Vote was taken:

In Favor 21 Opposed 10 Abstention 0

Chairperson present but not voting

Health and Human Services Committee

There was no report offered at this Meeting.

Veteran’s Committee

There was no report offered at this Meeting.

Mr. Conley thanked all Attendees for remaining at this meeting. This meeting was in session until 11 pm.

This meeting has been adjourned.

The next Community Board 2 Monthly Meeting and Public Hearing has been scheduled for Thursday, May 1^st 2008.

Respectfully submitted by:

Cheryl Sinnott